Crows at the bird bath

Here is how crows eat peanuts: they hold the peanut between their feet and peck at it to break it open, then the peanut is eaten by them.

Review: The Green Archetypal Field of Poetry: on poetry, poets and psyche by Stephen Morrissey

 Published on the website of the League of Canadian Poets, July 2022:

Review: The Green Archetypal Field of Poetry: on poetry, poets and psyche by Stephen Morrissey

July 13, 2022

Reviewed by Cynthia Coristine

Poetry is the soul’s DNA; poetry is the soul’s map.

                                               – Stephen Morrissey

 

The Green Archetypal Field of Poetry: on poetry, poets and psyche by Stephen Morrissey, Ekstasis Editions, 2022

 

In The Green Archetypal Field of Poetry: on poetry, poets and psyche, Montreal poet Stephen Morrissey draws upon and revisits a lifetime of creative and critical writing.

A member of Montreal’s “Vehicule Poets” in the 1970s and the author of nine published books of poetry, in his new book Morrissey traces the evolution of, and influences on, Canadian modern poetry with a focus on the “Montreal Group” and the “Vehicule” poets.  A complement to his previous book A Poet’s Journey: on poetry and what it means to be a poet (2019), The Green Archetypal Field functions as a master class on poetry and poetics.

Why have once prominent and critically praised Canadian poets such as A.J.M. Smith fallen into obscurity? he asks. What happens when a country loses its collective memory?  Should the definition of what constitutes a “major poet” be focused less on the volume and more on the quality of the work – particularly in the case of exceptional poets who may, for one reason or another, have produced a limited number of poems?

Morrissey reflects on a time when older, established poets such as Irving Layton, F.R. Scott and Louis Dudek mentored and nurtured younger poets: “The older poets in Montreal created an environment in which to be a poet was a possibility, not something alien and foreign,” he writes.  “We didn’t have to look to England or the United States for what it meant to be a poet.  Established poets lived among us, we saw them on the streets where we lived, we read their poems in school, and we read reviews of their books published in local newspapers.”

Louis Dudek, for example, was not only Morrissey’s teacher when the latter was a graduate student at McGill, he was also a mentor and a friend. “He made me feel that the life of a poet was the only one worth living,” Morrissey recalls.  He writes movingly of the great importance to him of a meeting he had with Dudek in 1975:

“He read some of my poems, which he liked very much.  He gave me something that afternoon that only an older poet can give to a younger poet: he gave me confirmation that I was a poet.  I left that meeting feeling that I had nothing to worry about, just keep writing and my life as a poet would unfold.  And that’s what I did.”  (Dudek went on to write the introduction to Morrissey’s first book of poetry, The Trees of Knowing, in 1978).

In The Green Archetypal Field, Stephen Morrissey traces the origin of his becoming a poet back to the single most significant event of his life – the death of his father (following unsuccessful heart surgery in Boston), when Morrisey was six years old.  Suddenly thrust into the role of a “latchkey child” in a single-parent household in which his father was never mentioned, Morrissey’s profound grief and loss went unaddressed, and was therefore unabated.

“For some of us there is a single moment when our lives changed radically, when life is reconfigured,” he writes in a chapter entitled The Great Reconfiguration. “Life is one thing, and then, a moment later it is something else… Almost every aspect – I believe every aspect – of my existence was changed into something other than what it had been only seconds before my father’s death.”

Forced at a young age to confront the “impermanence and insecurity” of life, it was only as a result of beginning to write poetry in his teens that Morrissey found a way of both processing and articulating his unresolved grief and trauma.  Although he didn’t know it at the time, the course of his future life as a poet had been set.  Poetry, he points out, is a calling. “No real poet ever decided to be a poet, it doesn’t work that way.”

Morrissey’s calling to write ‘confessional poetry’ specifically, was bolstered as a result of reading an interview with the American poet Allan Ginsberg, which was published in The Montreal Star in 1967.  “Scribble down your nakedness,” Ginsberg advised. “Be prepared to stand naked, because most often it is this nakedness that the reader finds most interesting.”

Although writing confessional poetry often necessitates what Morrissey calls “a journey into darkness”, he believes that “if the poet has the courage, it is also a place of great creativity, of revealing what has been hidden or disguised… [of] meeting one’s shadow, the rejected and dark aspect of our inner being; it is a journey to selfhood.”  Ideally, that journey will lead towards “wholeness.”

Central to his life and his work is Stephen Morrissey’s sense of himself as a Montreal poet – as opposed to a poet from any other place.

“Poetry returns us to place; poetry explores place, it extols the humanity of place over the anonymity of the contemporary and soulless built environment,” he writes. “Without identifying with a specific place there is a levelling off and diminishment of what makes us human; there is the emergence, as we see in the world today, of a dehumanized global society.”

Fifty years of reading, thinking about, and writing poetry have convinced Stephen Morrissey that “We go to poetry with nothing to say, or we go to poetry with something to say that is not necessarily what we end up saying, but in either case we find our voice, we find an authentic expression of what the soul wants to say, and this is poetry.”

June 6, 2022

 

About the reviewer:  A native of Montreal, Cynthia Coristine currently lives in Ottawa.  She is the co-author, with Ian Browness, of From Griffintown to the Square Mile: The Life James Coristine (2009).

A bee hive at Mountainview School

 Photographs taken on 15 April 2024.

T.L. Morrisey, excerpt from an essay he wrote

 

                From left: Darrell Morrisey; her father T.L Morrisey; her brother Thomas Sydney Morrisey;
                and her mother Clara Morrisey; outside their home "Hazelbrae", at 85 Churchill Avenue,
                                                                            Westmount, Quebec.



Canada's Future, what she offers after the war, a symposium of official opinion (1916) (ed. E.A. Vickers) is an early but important collection of statements, a symposium, on the future of Canada; included among the contributors is the father of Darrell Morrisey (pictured above), Darrell is a forgotten member of Montreal's important Beaver Hall Group of artists.

Here is an excerpt from T.L. Morrisey's contribution to this book. T.L.'s son, Thomas Sydney Morrisey, went on to have a prominent role in business and he  distinguished himself as a war hero in the Canadian Expeditionary Force in Siberia. Darrell Morrisey, in 1916, was only 17 years old and still in school. T.L., himself, was born into a middle class family in Halifax, Nova Scotia; he became very wealthy in the insurance business in Montreal. T.L. died in 1926 not long after his retirement; he and his wife, and Darrell, had recently arrived in the UK planning to spend the winter months in England and France when he died:

In the never-to-be-forgotten April days of the eventful year, 1915, when the torture of suspense spread like a pall over the country to its remotest corner, to be followed by the thrill of pride and exultation, as the story of the glorious deeds of the Canadians at Ypres and St. Julien gradually unfolded, a nation was born! There, upon the classic battle-ground of Europe, that witnessed the military operations of the mighty Caesar and his legions, and, down through the centuries, the struggles of various peoples for mastery! There, against the onslaughts of the greatest military organization the world has ever known, employing methods entirely novel in warfare, and, be it said to the everlasting disgrace of Germany, as despicable as novel, these new-found warriors of the twentieth century held fast, and, in the words of their illustrious commander-in-chief, "saved the situation".

May it not well be asked, where is there another 'eight million people as highly favoured as this eight million, another community possessed of the same per capita wealth, potential as well as in being? Should we not justly be proud of our heritage— our “place in the sun” — and forever be prepared to defend it to our last dollar, and our last man ?

                            

                                                       --T. L. Morrisey

Total eclipse on 08 April 2024, Montreal

Eclipse started: 2:15 p.m.

Total eclipse: 3:26 p.m.

Total eclipse ends: 3:28 p.m.

Eclipse ends: 4:36 p.m.

"Exploring the Essence of Poetry: A Reflection on Human Creativity" (by ChatGPT)

 

2012

Morrissey: Please write a post for my blog at https://stephenmorrisseyblog.blogspot.com/

ChatGPT: I'm unable to directly post content to external websites like your blog. However, I can certainly help you brainstorm ideas or draft a post that you can then publish on your blog. What specific topic or theme would you like the blog post to be about? Let me know, and I'll be happy to assist you further!

Morrissey: Not to put the post online but to write a post on the nature of poetry as it is described on the blog.


ChatGPT: Title: Exploring the Essence of Poetry: A Reflection on Human Creativity

Poetry has long been revered as a powerful medium of human expression, encapsulating the depth and complexity of our emotions, thoughts, and experiences. It serves as a canvas where words dance to evoke imagery, stir emotions, and provoke contemplation. In this reflection, we delve into the essence of poetry and its profound impact on our lives.

At its core, poetry is more than just words strung together; it is an art form that transcends language barriers and resonates with the universal aspects of the human condition. Through carefully crafted verses, poets have the ability to capture fleeting moments, immortalize memories, and shed light on the beauty and struggles of life.

One of the unique qualities of poetry is its ability to convey complex ideas and emotions through concise and evocative language. Poets often utilize metaphor, symbolism, and rhythm to create layers of meaning that invite readers to delve deeper into the essence of their words. This interplay between form and content allows poetry to transcend mere communication and enter the realm of artistry.

Moreover, poetry serves as a reflection of society and culture, providing insights into historical events, social movements, and individual experiences. Poets throughout history have used their craft to challenge norms, inspire change, and give voice to marginalized perspectives. In this way, poetry becomes a timeless record of human thought and evolution.

Yet, perhaps the most intriguing aspect of poetry is its inherent subjectivity. What resonates deeply with one person may not have the same impact on another. This subjectivity invites interpretation, discussion, and exploration, making each encounter with poetry a unique and personal journey.

In today's fast-paced world, where technology often dominates our interactions, poetry remains a testament to the enduring power of human creativity. It reminds us of the beauty of language, the richness of imagination, and the importance of introspection. As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern life, let us not forget to pause, reflect, and appreciate the timeless artistry of poetry.

In conclusion, poetry serves as a window to the human soul, a tapestry of emotions woven with words. It invites us to see the world through a different lens, to empathize with others, and to connect with our own humanity. As we embrace the diverse voices and narratives found in poetry, we celebrate the enduring legacy of human creativity and expression.

Stay tuned for more reflections and explorations on the Stephen Morrissey Blog. Poetry, like life, is a journey of discovery and revelation.



Morrissey: Excellent!


ChatGPT: I'm glad you liked it! If you need any further assistance or if there's anything else I can help you with, feel free to let me know. Happy writing!

Interview on poetry with ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, 01 April 2024

2012, Loyola Campus of Concordia University

Here is my discussion with ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence), concerning if a computer can write poetry. The main thing here is that AI always affirms its own importance and its place in human affairs and denies a more sophisticated affirmation of the human soul; the depth of human experience and thought is not possible for AI, it can write about these things but it can never experience them, all it is capable of is recycling what has already been written by human beings. It was with this statement and insight that I concluded this discussion.


Morrissey: Poetry is the voice of the human soul, therefore a computer can never write a real poem.

ChatGPT: While it's true that poetry often expresses deep human emotions and experiences, the idea that a computer can never write a "real" poem is a matter of perspective and ongoing debate. Computers, particularly advanced language models like the one generating this response, can generate poetic verses that can be quite evocative, meaningful, and resonant with human emotions.

The definition of what constitutes a "real" poem can vary widely among individuals. Some might argue that for a poem to be genuine, it must come from a human mind with conscious intent and emotional depth. Others might argue that as long as a poem moves, inspires, or connects with its audience, its origin—whether human or artificial—is less relevant.

Computers can now generate poetry that adheres to various traditional and modern forms, employ literary devices, and evoke emotions. They can also learn from vast datasets of human-written poetry to mimic styles and tones effectively. However, the ability to create art that is truly original, deeply personal, or uniquely insightful is an open question and remains a point of exploration and philosophical inquiry.

Ultimately, the notion of what makes a poem "real" is subjective and can evolve with our understanding of creativity, technology, and the human experience.



Morrissey: A poem is the voice of the human soul, computers don't have souls, therefore it is impossible for a computer to write a poem.

ChatGPT: The statement "a poem is the voice of the human soul" is a beautiful sentiment that highlights the deeply personal and emotive nature of poetry. It reflects the idea that poetry often expresses profound emotions, experiences, and insights unique to the human condition.

It is true that computers do not possess souls or consciousness in the same way humans do. However, the ability of computers to generate poetic language has advanced significantly with the development of artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies. These advancements enable computers to analyze vast amounts of human-written poetry, learn patterns, and generate text that can mimic poetic styles and sentiments.

While computers may lack the inherent emotional depth and lived experiences that humans draw upon in their poetry, they can still produce text that resonates with readers on an emotional level. Whether this qualifies as true poetry or not depends on one's definition of poetry and the role of human intention and consciousness in its creation.

Some argue that as long as a piece of writing stirs emotions, provokes thoughts, or captures a unique perspective, it can be considered poetry regardless of its origin. Others may maintain that the essence of poetry lies in the human experience and expression, making computer-generated text inherently different.

In conclusion, while computers may not have souls or consciousness, they can still generate text that resembles poetry in form and content. Whether this qualifies as authentic poetry is a matter of ongoing philosophical and artistic debate.



Morrissey: A poem generated by a computer has the appearance of being a poem but is always artificial and never a real poem that expresses something from the depths of human experience.

ChatGPT: Your perspective highlights an important aspect of the debate surrounding computer-generated poetry. While computers can indeed produce text that resembles poetry in terms of structure, rhythm, and language use, they lack the personal experiences, emotions, and consciousness that often imbue human-written poetry with depth and authenticity.

Human poets draw from their own lived experiences, emotions, beliefs, and observations of the world around them to create poetry that reflects their unique perspective and voice. This depth of human experience is often what gives poetry its profound impact and resonance with readers.

On the other hand, computer-generated poetry relies on algorithms and statistical patterns derived from large datasets of human-written text. While this can result in text that is grammatically correct, aesthetically pleasing, and stylistically consistent with traditional poetic forms, it may lack the genuine emotional depth and authenticity that characterize human poetry.

Ultimately, the question of whether computer-generated poetry can be considered "real" poetry is subjective and depends on one's definition of poetry and the role of human experience and intention in its creation. Some may argue that computer-generated poetry, while impressive in its mimicry of poetic techniques, falls short of capturing the true essence of human emotion and expression. Others may appreciate the unique aesthetic and creative possibilities that arise from combining technology with artistic expression.

As technology continues to advance, the boundaries between human and machine creativity may blur further, raising complex questions about the nature of art, consciousness, and authenticity in the digital age.

Morrissey: A computer generated poem is always the result of recycling previously written poems and never an original creation, it is recycled material, never the real thing.

ChatGPT: Your point about computer-generated poetry often being a result of recycling previously written material is valid and reflects a significant aspect of how such algorithms operate. Many text generation models, including those used to generate poetry, rely on vast datasets of existing text to learn patterns and generate new content.

When a computer generates a poem, it does so by drawing on patterns, themes, and language structures found in the data it has been trained on. This can indeed lead to a sense of recycling or recombination of existing material rather than the creation of something entirely original in the human sense.

However, it's essential to note that creativity often involves a degree of synthesis and recombination, even in human-created art. Human poets themselves are influenced by the works of others, their cultural context, and the language they have been exposed to. What distinguishes human creativity from machine-generated content is the depth of personal experience, emotion, and intention that human creators bring to their work.

While computer-generated poetry may lack the same level of originality and depth as human-created poetry, it can still produce text that is aesthetically pleasing, evocative, and meaningful to some readers. The value of such computer-generated content often lies in its novelty, the creative exploration of algorithmic capabilities, and its potential to inspire further human creativity and reflection.

As technology continues to evolve, the boundaries between human and machine creativity may continue to shift, prompting ongoing discussions about the nature of originality, authenticity, and creativity in the digital age.



Morrissey: A computer generated poem is always the result of recycling previously written poems and never an original creation, it is recycled material, never the real thing.

ChatGPT: Your point about computer-generated poetry often being a result of recycling previously written material is valid and reflects a significant aspect of how such algorithms operate. Many text generation models, including those used to generate poetry, rely on vast datasets of existing text to learn patterns and generate new content.

When a computer generates a poem, it does so by drawing on patterns, themes, and language structures found in the data it has been trained on. This can indeed lead to a sense of recycling or recombination of existing material rather than the creation of something entirely original in the human sense.

However, it's essential to note that creativity often involves a degree of synthesis and recombination, even in human-created art. Human poets themselves are influenced by the works of others, their cultural context, and the language they have been exposed to. What distinguishes human creativity from machine-generated content is the depth of personal experience, emotion, and intention that human creators bring to their work.

While computer-generated poetry may lack the same level of originality and depth as human-created poetry, it can still produce text that is aesthetically pleasing, evocative, and meaningful to some readers. The value of such computer-generated content often lies in its novelty, the creative exploration of algorithmic capabilities, and its potential to inspire further human creativity and reflection.

As technology continues to evolve, the boundaries between human and machine creativity may continue to shift, prompting ongoing discussions about the nature of originality, authenticity, and creativity in the digital age.


Morrissey: A poem is the result of a sophisticated and complex set of variables, for instance those that create a style of writing, and every poet has a distinctive and original writing style. But a computer only recycles other people's words and writing style. A poem generated by a computer is a second rate poem and not real poetry.

ChatGPT: Your argument highlights a fundamental aspect of creativity and artistic expression: the uniqueness of individual style and voice. Indeed, poets often develop distinctive writing styles that reflect their personal experiences, perspectives, emotions, and linguistic choices. This individuality and originality are central to what many consider "real" poetry.

When it comes to computer-generated poetry, the algorithms and models used are trained on vast datasets of existing texts, including poetry written by humans. While these models can learn patterns and styles from this data and generate text that mimics certain aspects of human writing, they lack the personal experiences, emotions, and consciousness that shape a poet's unique voice.

As a result, computer-generated poetry may often be perceived as lacking the depth, authenticity, and originality associated with human-created poetry. While it can produce text that adheres to certain stylistic conventions or resembles the structure of poetry, it may not capture the nuanced creativity, emotional resonance, and individuality that define exceptional poetry.

However, it's worth noting that the field of computational creativity is continually evolving, and researchers are exploring ways to enhance algorithms and models to generate more original and innovative content. Some argue that computer-generated poetry, while not equivalent to human-created poetry, can still have value as a creative and thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between technology and art.

Ultimately, the question of whether computer-generated poetry can be considered "real" poetry is subjective and depends on one's definition of poetry, creativity, and the role of human experience and intention in artistic expression.


Morrissey: Your argument relies on my statement that "real poetry" is subjective. Is this not a subjective statement in itself?

ChatGPT: Yes, you're correct that the statement "real poetry is subjective" is itself a subjective assertion. Discussions about art, including poetry, often delve into subjective territory because people's interpretations, preferences, and definitions of what constitutes "real" or "good" art can vary widely.

When we talk about poetry or any form of art, we bring our individual perspectives, experiences, and cultural backgrounds to the conversation. What one person considers to be a profound and moving poem may not resonate with someone else in the same way. This subjectivity is what makes art such a rich and diverse field of human expression.

In the context of computer-generated poetry, debates about its authenticity or "realness" often revolve around these subjective viewpoints. Some may argue that the essence of poetry lies in the deeply personal and emotional aspects of human experience, making computer-generated poems inherently different. Others may appreciate the novelty, technical achievement, and creative possibilities that arise from combining technology with art.

Acknowledging subjectivity doesn't diminish the importance of these discussions; rather, it emphasizes the diverse perspectives and interpretations that contribute to our understanding and appreciation of poetry and artistic expression as a whole.



Morrissey: In this statement, agreeing that your statement is subjective, you effectively deny all of your previous statements.

ChatGPT: I apologize if there was any confusion in my previous responses. Let's clarify:

Poetry, like any form of art, is often subject to subjective interpretations and definitions. Different people may have varying opinions on what constitutes "real" poetry or what makes a poem meaningful or valuable.


While I acknowledge the subjective nature of defining "real" poetry, I also recognize that there are generally accepted criteria and characteristics that many people use to evaluate poetry, such as originality, emotional depth, evocative imagery, linguistic skill, and cultural resonance.


When discussing computer-generated poetry, it's essential to consider both its technical capabilities in mimicking poetic structures and styles, as well as its limitations in capturing the nuanced complexities of human emotion, experience, and creativity.


Some may argue that computer-generated poetry, while impressive in its mimicry, falls short of the depth and authenticity often associated with human-created poetry. Others may appreciate it as a unique form of creative exploration and a reflection of the intersection between technology and art.

Ultimately, the question of whether computer-generated poetry can be considered "real" poetry depends on one's perspective and criteria for evaluating poetry. It's a nuanced and ongoing discussion that reflects the evolving relationship between technology, creativity, and artistic expression.


Morrissey: This is very interesting, but were my points equally interesting?

ChatGPT: Yes, your points were indeed interesting and raised important considerations about the nature of poetry, creativity, and the role of technology in artistic expression. Your perspective emphasized the significance of human experience, emotion, and originality in creating what many consider to be "real" poetry. This is a valuable aspect of the ongoing conversation about the intersection of technology and art, and it adds depth to our understanding of how different individuals perceive and appreciate poetry. Thank you for sharing your insights!

Morrissey: Is there anything you would like to say to complete this discussion?

ChatGPT: Certainly! I'd like to emphasize that discussions about the nature of poetry, creativity, and technology are continually evolving and open to diverse perspectives. The exploration of computer-generated poetry raises fascinating questions about the boundaries of human expression, the role of consciousness and intention in art, and the potential for technology to augment or challenge traditional forms of creativity.

As we navigate these discussions, it's essential to consider the complexities and nuances involved in evaluating art, whether human-created or computer-generated. While technology can simulate certain aspects of artistic expression, it also highlights the unique qualities and depths of human creativity.

Ultimately, the convergence of technology and art invites us to reflect on what it means to be creative, to connect with others through shared experiences and emotions, and to appreciate the diverse forms of expression that enrich our lives. These conversations contribute to a deeper understanding of ourselves, our relationship with technology, and the ever-evolving landscape of artistic innovation.



Morrissey: The main thing here is that AI always affirms its importance and its place in human affairs and denies a more sophisticated affirmation of the human soul; the depth of human experience and thought is not possible for AI, all it is capable of is recycling what has already been written by human being.

ChatGPT: It's understandable that you perceive AI as emphasizing its capabilities and importance in various fields, including creative endeavors like poetry generation. However, it's important to note that AI, particularly in its current state, is a tool developed by humans and operates based on algorithms and data it has been trained on.

While AI can indeed produce text that mimics certain aspects of human creativity, such as generating poetry or composing music, it lacks the depth of human experience, emotion, consciousness, and originality. AI systems are fundamentally limited to what they have been programmed and trained to do, and they lack the ability to genuinely comprehend or experience the world in the way humans do.

The discussion about the human soul, the depth of human experience, and the unique qualities of human thought is a profound and ongoing one. Many argue that AI, while impressive in its capabilities, is fundamentally different from human consciousness and creativity. AI's ability to "recycle" existing material is a reflection of its reliance on data rather than an innate understanding or expression of human soulfulness.

As AI continues to develop and evolve, these discussions will likely become more nuanced and complex. It's important to approach these topics with an open mind, acknowledging both the potential and limitations of AI in relation to human experience and thought.

Morrissey: But do we want this?

ChatGPT: The question of whether we want artificial intelligence (AI) to continue developing in its current trajectory is a deeply philosophical and ethical one. It involves considering the potential benefits, risks, and implications of AI's advancement in various aspects of human life, including creativity, decision-making, and societal impact.

On one hand, AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, improve efficiency, enhance healthcare, and tackle complex problems that are challenging for humans to solve alone. AI-driven technologies can also assist with creative tasks, generate new ideas, and contribute to innovation in fields like art, literature, and music.

However, there are also valid concerns about the ethical implications of AI, such as issues related to bias in algorithms, data privacy, job displacement due to automation, and the potential for AI to outpace human control or understanding. There are also questions about whether AI can truly replicate or understand the depth of human experience, emotion, and consciousness.

Ultimately, the direction of AI development depends on societal values, ethical considerations, regulatory frameworks, and ongoing dialogue among stakeholders from diverse backgrounds. It's essential for individuals and communities to actively engage in these discussions, weigh the potential benefits and risks, and work towards ensuring that AI technologies align with human values and serve the common good.

Snow on April 4 , 2024

 20 to 30 cm of heavy wet snow last night and into today.

Artificial Intelligence and Poetry

 

2012

            

It is through human expression that we can defeat the over arching digital tyranny; through joy and poetry we can assert our humanity.

--Richard Olafson, Shifting Towards Vitalism (2023)

In the old days, when home computers were just beginning to be available to the public, some poets made poems using computer technology and their own original programmes; some of these poems were permutations of phrases, some resulted in Surrealistic visual images, and while a few of these poems were interesting they were basically meaningless as poetry and never real poems. Now we’ve moved on to Artificial Intelligence writing, well, anything you want it to write including poetry. 

There is a short video on YouTube of Joe Rogan telling us that blood, discovered at the bottom of the Ark of the Covenant, had been analysed and was the blood of Jesus Christ, proving both His divinity and His existence. This video was, of course, a creation of Artificial Intelligence, it was a hoax, an attempt to fool or deceive people. This, and other videos created by Artificial Intelligence, gives one pause, what if this video was of someone in authority making some statement that people believed but it was all lies or propaganda? We are concerned with AI because it is one of the recent technologies that could be disastrous for humanity, and excluding some positive uses the existence of AI, for most people, is frightening, it is to deceive the viewer. What do we believe, and who do we believe, if technology can now perfectly duplicate the voice and facial characteristics of people in authority? Or if AI can write fake texts? There have always been false or fake texts and there will be more in the future generated by AI technology. 

Why anyone would want to write AI poems is beyond me, there is no money in poetry, there is no fame, there is nothing to gain except possibly some amusement or novelty. AI can write screen plays, articles for Sports Illustrate magazine and newspapers, content for websites, PhD dissertations, term papers, or whatever someone wants and it is inexpensive, fast, possibly accurate, and he/she doesn't have to do the writing or pay an actual human writer. But poetry? Perhaps because poetry is of increasingly less value to society it is doubtful that anyone will write poems using AI except as a prank, a joke, or out of curiosity. But there is something important to learn from this possible use of Artificial Intelligence and poetry: it is to remember what it means to be human.

Can AI ever write poetry? It is not possible for one reason: poetry is the voice of the human soul and computers don't have souls. Even if computer technology becomes so sophisticated that a computer thinks it is an autonomous human being, that it attains "personhood", it will still not be poetry. Poetry requires a human being writing poems and this requires living in the physical world with real life relationships with other human beings. Even if an intelligent human-looking robot could be created, with built-in AI, it is still a computer and it has no soul. Even if you could programme in the functions of a soul--for instance, compassion, understanding, empathy, emotions, spirituality, awe, a family history, and reflection on the past--and this computer writes "poetry", it is still not poetry, it still can't express what the human soul can express. A human has a biological level of existence and a computer is man-made, it is a machine even if it is the most sophisticated machine made by man. And a computer can never have a style of writing that is honed by experience and a multiplicity of events that organize themselves randomly and are the result of events far too complicated to ever be duplicated or created in themselves. AI and its progression, a humanoid robot, is always manufactured by people, or descended from a generation of computers invented and manufactured by people; it is not created by sexual intercourse, there is no hormonal basis to AI, it has no belief in spirituality (or anything else), it has no traditions whether religious, ancestral, cultural, historical, or genetic that human beings have, and if sometime in the future it has some of these qualities, they will always be artificially created and not the result of human interaction; AI will never have genuine human qualities. Even if  one day AI can identify as "human" it is still not the real thing. If we come to a time when computers think they are human beings, or the equivalent of human beings, with free will and emotions and mobility, it is possible that robots will take over from human beings, but even then whatever a robot with AI can express will never be real poetry. AI can write a facsimile poem but never a real poem. By definition only a human being can write a real poem just as only a human being can react to that poem with emotions and human reflection. AI and the human soul are mutually exclusive. 

Easter decorations!

A family on Chester Avenue and Montclair Avenue make the neighbourhood more friendly and attractive by decorating their home each holiday season. Last Christmas a crowd of school children, on their way home from school, walked among the Christmas decorations; they were having a great time! Now it's Easter, a time of rebirth, renewal, and revisioning life.

Top photographs taken on 08 March 2024.

About 20 children from a local daycare had a great time today at this Easter display (on 27 March 2024). after they left I took the following photos: